the RPF   Replica Movie Props
Replica
Props
Screen Used Movie Props
Screen Used
Props
Movie Costumes
Replica
Costumes
General Modeling
General
Modeling
Studio Scale Models
Studio Scale
Models
Movie Discussion
Movie
Discussion
 
Collaborate, create, and collect at the internet's largest community dedicated to props, costumes and models.    The Replica Prop Forum on Facebook   The Replica Prop Forum on Twitter   The Replica Prop Forum RSS Feed   The Replica Prop Forum on YouTube

Go Back   the RPF > COMMUNITY > Entertainment and Movie Forum

Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

Discussion on Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013 within the Entertainment and Movie Forum forum, part of the COMMUNITY category; http://www.torontosun.com/2011/11/25...el-pushed-back May 17th, 2013 is the new date, according to

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-25-2011, 11:30 AM
Thread Starter
  #1
Fugit-aboutit!
 
Tempus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Vanishing Point
Posts: 422
Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!
Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

http://www.torontosun.com/2011/11/25...el-pushed-back

May 17th, 2013 is the new date, according to this article.

GI Joe 2 is going into its spot.
Tempus is offline   Reply With Quote
Ads ( Don't want to see advertising between posts? Register for free and become a member of our community! )
RPF Sponsors
RPF Recommends
Old 11-25-2011, 11:35 AM   #2
 
phase pistol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 14,351
phase pistol has a reputation level greater than 100!phase pistol has a reputation level greater than 100!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

Not at all surprising. The first film was pushed back from 2008 to 2009.

I hope they use the extra time to develop a better-looking Enterprise and less bizarre looking hand props. .

K
phase pistol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 12:15 PM   #3
 
MooCriket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 5,161
MooCriket has a reputation level greater than 300!MooCriket has a reputation level greater than 300!MooCriket has a reputation level greater than 300!MooCriket has a reputation level greater than 300!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

I hope they will using the extra time to add even more lense flare. Let's face it, there was not enough in the last film, and it ruined the film for me.
MooCriket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 12:24 PM   #4
 
phase pistol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 14,351
phase pistol has a reputation level greater than 100!phase pistol has a reputation level greater than 100!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

Sparkly!
phase pistol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 12:25 PM   #5
 
neosporing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: midwest (wish it was Negril Jamaica)
Posts: 987
neosporing has a reputation level greater than 10!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by phase pistol View Post
I hope they use the extra time to develop a better-looking Enterprise and less bizarre looking hand props. .

K
QFT
neosporing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 12:29 PM   #6
 
darth_myeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 1,268
darth_myeek has a reputation level greater than 1,000!darth_myeek has a reputation level greater than 1,000!darth_myeek has a reputation level greater than 1,000!darth_myeek has a reputation level greater than 1,000!darth_myeek has a reputation level greater than 1,000!darth_myeek has a reputation level greater than 1,000!darth_myeek has a reputation level greater than 1,000!darth_myeek has a reputation level greater than 1,000!darth_myeek has a reputation level greater than 1,000!darth_myeek has a reputation level greater than 1,000!darth_myeek has a reputation level greater than 1,000!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by MooCriket View Post
I hope they will using the extra time to add even more lens flare.
More lens flare!

and definitely more Keenser.
darth_myeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 01:37 PM
Thread Starter
  #7
Fugit-aboutit!
 
Tempus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Vanishing Point
Posts: 422
Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!Tempus has a reputation level greater than 1,000!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by MooCriket View Post
I hope they will using the extra time to add even more lense flare. Let's face it, there was not enough in the last film, and it ruined the film for me.
Nice
Tempus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 01:40 PM   #8
 
Solo4114's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,670
Solo4114 has a reputation level greater than 50!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by MooCriket View Post
I hope they will using the extra time to add even more lense flare. Let's face it, there was not enough in the last film, and it ruined the film for me.
Actually, I heard the film has already been shot, but post-production to remove the previously added lens flare is taking longer than expected. Thus, the delay.
Solo4114 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 01:58 PM   #9
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Florida
Posts: 2,843
CB2001 has a reputation level greater than 10!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by MooCriket View Post
I hope they will using the extra time to add even more lense flare. Let's face it, there was not enough in the last film, and it ruined the film for me.
Just out of curiosity, does anyone know why Abrams insists on having so much lens flare? I mean, I haven't found any answer as to why he's so infatuated with it.
CB2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 02:09 PM   #10
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,490
CessnaDriver has a reputation level greater than 100!CessnaDriver has a reputation level greater than 100!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

I swore I saw STII in 82 though.

:P
CessnaDriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 02:19 PM   #11
 
phase pistol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 14,351
phase pistol has a reputation level greater than 100!phase pistol has a reputation level greater than 100!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

I had read somewhere that Abrams was so taken with the idea that the Enterprise was brand new, and that the Star Trek future was so "bright and hopeful", that he just went nuts with those lens flares (which were for the most part done on-set by shining lights directly into the camera lens from just out of frame - not a an effect added in post).

Since the release though Abrams has admitted that maybe he went a little overboard on the flares.

k
phase pistol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 03:01 PM   #12
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 2,614
GeneralFROSTY has a reputation level greater than 100!GeneralFROSTY has a reputation level greater than 100!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

Im a continuity freak.
Im really hoping we don't see re-designed uniforms and sets. I rather enjoyed the way everything looked, despite what the haters have to say on the matter.
GeneralFROSTY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 03:14 PM   #13
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 13,947
apollo has a reputation level greater than 100!apollo has a reputation level greater than 100!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

Hopefully it will be pushed back untill 2050 that way if I'm still around I won't care by then!



Quote:
Originally Posted by Tempus View Post
http://www.torontosun.com/2011/11/25...el-pushed-back

May 17th, 2013 is the new date, according to this article.

GI Joe 2 is going into its spot.
apollo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 03:15 PM   #14
Foux Du Fafa
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 10,450
micdavis has a reputation level greater than 1,000!micdavis has a reputation level greater than 1,000!micdavis has a reputation level greater than 1,000!micdavis has a reputation level greater than 1,000!micdavis has a reputation level greater than 1,000!micdavis has a reputation level greater than 1,000!micdavis has a reputation level greater than 1,000!micdavis has a reputation level greater than 1,000!micdavis has a reputation level greater than 1,000!micdavis has a reputation level greater than 1,000!micdavis has a reputation level greater than 1,000!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

So you guys will have an extra year to complain and then go see it anyway.

Congrats.
micdavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 03:59 PM   #15
 
SSgt Burton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,327
SSgt Burton has a reputation level greater than 50!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by phase pistol View Post
I hope they use the extra time to develop a better-looking Enterprise and less bizarre looking hand props. .
A better story would be nice too, but I'm saving my money this round.


Kevin
SSgt Burton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 04:14 PM   #16
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 13,947
apollo has a reputation level greater than 100!apollo has a reputation level greater than 100!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

No way Jose!

You know what Scotty once said, "Fool me once......


Quote:
Originally Posted by micdavis View Post
So you guys will have an extra year to complain and then go see it anyway.

Congrats.
apollo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 05:01 PM   #17
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Florida
Posts: 2,843
CB2001 has a reputation level greater than 10!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by apollo View Post
No way Jose!

You know what Scotty once said, "Fool me once......
But he also said to over-estimate things so that when you pull things off right like you should, you look like a miracle worker.
CB2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 08:23 PM   #18
 
MooCriket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 5,161
MooCriket has a reputation level greater than 300!MooCriket has a reputation level greater than 300!MooCriket has a reputation level greater than 300!MooCriket has a reputation level greater than 300!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

I would love to see Bones get more screen time. Urban would have made Kelley proud with how closely he played the role to the original character.
MooCriket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2011, 09:50 PM   #19
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,607
thegreatgalling has a reputation level greater than 1,000!thegreatgalling has a reputation level greater than 1,000!thegreatgalling has a reputation level greater than 1,000!thegreatgalling has a reputation level greater than 1,000!thegreatgalling has a reputation level greater than 1,000!thegreatgalling has a reputation level greater than 1,000!thegreatgalling has a reputation level greater than 1,000!thegreatgalling has a reputation level greater than 1,000!thegreatgalling has a reputation level greater than 1,000!thegreatgalling has a reputation level greater than 1,000!thegreatgalling has a reputation level greater than 1,000!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

^ Agreed times ten. If this film doesn't FOCUS on the trilogy that is Spock, Kirk and McCoy, I WILL throw a plush Tribble at the screen.

Obv. the delay isn't great to hear, unless it translates to quality.
thegreatgalling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 02:23 AM   #20
Formerly cobalt crimson
 
Wes R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 4,471
Wes R has a reputation level greater than 750!Wes R has a reputation level greater than 750!Wes R has a reputation level greater than 750!Wes R has a reputation level greater than 750!Wes R has a reputation level greater than 750!Wes R has a reputation level greater than 750!Wes R has a reputation level greater than 750!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

Must be bad if it was pushed back and another steaming pile of crap put in its place lol.
Wes R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 06:42 AM   #21
 
CommanderCody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,156
CommanderCody has not been awarded enough reputation to matter.
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

I seriously don't see them re-re-designing the enterprise, I think we have to live with the one they have given us, although if it gets blown to bits then we can all start hoping they'll dust off the TMP refit again
CommanderCody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 08:40 AM   #22
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Rockin' The-RPF.com
Posts: 2,565
Nwerke has a reputation level greater than 300!Nwerke has a reputation level greater than 300!Nwerke has a reputation level greater than 300!Nwerke has a reputation level greater than 300!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by CommanderCody View Post
I seriously don't see them re-re-designing the enterprise, I think we have to live with the one they have given us, although if it gets blown to bits then we can all start hoping they'll dust off the TMP refit again
Yes please. Story-wise, just blow the engines off in a fight. Put 'new improved' ones on it, ones that look less like a kitsch sex toy. Reduce the pylon angle at the same time; don't even bother with an explanation, nobody will care and anyone with an ounce of taste will be grateful.

Also, build an engine room set, FFS.

Quote:
Originally Posted by micdavis View Post
So you guys will have an extra year to complain and then go see it anyway.

Congrats.
I'll have an extra year to look forward to it and will go and see it two or three times. The first Abrams movie saved Star Trek, let's face it.

No, really. It did.
Nwerke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 08:47 AM   #23
 
Mole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 117
Mole has a reputation level greater than 10!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

LOL! I didn't even notice the flares in Kirk's eyes!

Needs more Bones! Urban was without a doubt the best thing in the last Trek film.

And I wouldn't be against them recasting Scotty. I think Pegg is brilliant but he was totally miscast in this.
Mole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 10:14 AM   #24
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Florida
Posts: 2,843
CB2001 has a reputation level greater than 10!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mole View Post
LOL! I didn't even notice the flares in Kirk's eyes!

Needs more Bones! Urban was without a doubt the best thing in the last Trek film.

And I wouldn't be against them recasting Scotty. I think Pegg is brilliant but he was totally miscast in this.
I agree with everyone that they got Bones right. I thought Pegg was okay, considering that there's not many other actors these days that I think could even remotely capture Scotty very well (seriously I can't think of one). Spock, I'm still a little iffy on. Sulu, I'm also iffy on. I say they need to recast Uhura (seriously, Uhura had way too much attitude in comparison to the original Uhura that she doesn't remotely invoke any similarity in appearance or attitude) and Kirk (no offense to Chris Pine. I thought he did a great job in Bottle Shock and in Unstoppable, but he just doesn't scream Kirk to me).
CB2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 07:29 PM   #25
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,123
terryr has a reputation level greater than 10!
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013

When they push a movie back it's because they know it sucks.

And it takes a lot for them to notice.
terryr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Charlie pushed Chuck a little too far! 2 1/2 Men canceled mid-season Funky Jedi Entertainment and Movie Forum 214 05-14-2011 01:56 PM
Jodie Foster's Beaver pushed back dbalschi Entertainment and Movie Forum 37 03-17-2011 07:05 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 PM.


Copyright © 2012 Dsteam, LLC. All rights reserved.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8