![]() |
Replica Props |
Screen Used Props |
Replica Costumes |
General Modeling |
Studio Scale Models |
Movie Discussion |
|||
| Collaborate, create, and collect at the internet's largest community dedicated to props, costumes and models. |
|||||||||
|
Thread Starter
|
#1 |
|
Fugit-aboutit!
|
Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
May 17th, 2013 is the new date, according to this article. GI Joe 2 is going into its spot. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RPF Sponsors
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
Not at all surprising. The first film was pushed back from 2008 to 2009.
I hope they use the extra time to develop a better-looking Enterprise and less bizarre looking hand props. .K |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 5,161
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
I hope they will using the extra time to add even more lense flare. Let's face it, there was not enough in the last film, and it ruined the film for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
Sparkly!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: midwest (wish it was Negril Jamaica)
Posts: 987
![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 1,268
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Starter
|
#7 |
|
Fugit-aboutit!
|
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,670
![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
Actually, I heard the film has already been shot, but post-production to remove the previously added lens flare is taking longer than expected. Thus, the delay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Florida
Posts: 2,843
![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
Just out of curiosity, does anyone know why Abrams insists on having so much lens flare? I mean, I haven't found any answer as to why he's so infatuated with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
•
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,490
![]() ![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
I swore I saw STII in 82 though.
:P |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
I had read somewhere that Abrams was so taken with the idea that the Enterprise was brand new, and that the Star Trek future was so "bright and hopeful", that he just went nuts with those lens flares (which were for the most part done on-set by shining lights directly into the camera lens from just out of frame - not a an effect added in post).
Since the release though Abrams has admitted that maybe he went a little overboard on the flares. ![]() k |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
•
|
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
Im a continuity freak.
Im really hoping we don't see re-designed uniforms and sets. I rather enjoyed the way everything looked, despite what the haters have to say on the matter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 13,947
![]() ![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
Hopefully it will be pushed back untill 2050 that way if I'm still around I won't care by then!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Foux Du Fafa
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 10,450
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
So you guys will have an extra year to complain and then go see it anyway.
Congrats. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,327
![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 13,947
![]() ![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Florida
Posts: 2,843
![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 5,161
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
I would love to see Bones get more screen time. Urban would have made Kelley proud with how closely he played the role to the original character.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
•
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,607
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
^ Agreed times ten. If this film doesn't FOCUS on the trilogy that is Spock, Kirk and McCoy, I WILL throw a plush Tribble at the screen.
Obv. the delay isn't great to hear, unless it translates to quality. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Formerly cobalt crimson
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 4,471
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
Must be bad if it was pushed back and another steaming pile of crap put in its place lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,156
![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
I seriously don't see them re-re-designing the enterprise, I think we have to live with the one they have given us, although if it gets blown to bits then we can all start hoping they'll dust off the TMP refit again
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | ||
|
•
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Rockin' The-RPF.com
Posts: 2,565
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
Quote:
Also, build an engine room set, FFS. Quote:
![]() No, really. It did. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 117
![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
LOL! I didn't even notice the flares in Kirk's eyes!
Needs more Bones! Urban was without a doubt the best thing in the last Trek film. And I wouldn't be against them recasting Scotty. I think Pegg is brilliant but he was totally miscast in this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North Florida
Posts: 2,843
![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
I agree with everyone that they got Bones right. I thought Pegg was okay, considering that there's not many other actors these days that I think could even remotely capture Scotty very well (seriously I can't think of one). Spock, I'm still a little iffy on. Sulu, I'm also iffy on. I say they need to recast Uhura (seriously, Uhura had way too much attitude in comparison to the original Uhura that she doesn't remotely invoke any similarity in appearance or attitude) and Kirk (no offense to Chris Pine. I thought he did a great job in Bottle Shock and in Unstoppable, but he just doesn't scream Kirk to me).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,123
![]() |
Re: Star Trek 2 pushed back to 2013
When they push a movie back it's because they know it sucks.
And it takes a lot for them to notice. |
|
|
|